Report No.: CCEER-91-4
A Study of Protective Overlays for Highway Bridge Decks in Nevada, with
Emphasis on Polyester-Styrene Polymer Concrete
Authors: D. N. O'Connor and M. "Saiid" Saiidi
Date: October 1991
Sponsoring Agency: Nevada Department of Transportation
- Performing Organization:
Department of Civil Engineering/258
University of Nevada, Reno
Reno, NV 89557
- Abstract:
- A major problem facing state and federal highway departments is the deterioration of
bridge decks due to the corrosion of reinforcing steel. Polyester-styrene polymer concrete
overlays provide durable and wear-resistant surfaces for portland cement concrete bridge
decks, and can be formulated to provide low water and chloride permeabilities. In order to
study the effects of the composite action between the portland cement concrete deck and
the polymer concrete overlay, a knowledge of the material properties of the chosen polymer
must be obtained, and the compatibility of the material with portland cement concrete must
be determined.
- This report provides an introduction to the materials under consideration and a
comparison of the engineering properties of portland cement concrete and polyester-styrene
polymer concrete. Properties considered include compressive strength, modulus of
elasticity, tensile strength, flexural strength, thermal expansion characteristics, rate
of compressive strength gain, high temperature strength degradation, shrinkage, and creep.
- The bond between the polymer concrete overlay and the portland cement concrete deck
results in a composite section with distinct areas of different physical properties.
Because the polyester-styrene concrete and the portland cement concrete exhibit different
coefficients of thermal expansion and moduli of elasticity, composite action under
temperature change raises a concern.
- Two finite element models were used to determine the compatibility between the concrete
bridge deck and the polyester-styrene overlay. Allowable stresses due to temperature were
determined using the ACI ultimate strength method and both AASHTO service load and
ultimate strength methods. Results of the analysis are presented, and an-attempt to
explain any excessive stresses is made (Abstract by authors).